“Mexico’s policy is consistent: It makes every effort to appear to be stopping the drug trade so that it will not be accused of supporting it. The government does not object to disrupting one or more of the smuggling groups, so long as the aggregate inflow of cash does not materially decline.“
Friedman, George "Mexico and the Failed State Revisited" STRATFOR Global Intelligence, April 6, 2010
...
“It is here that the sovereign power must intervene, not necessarily to kill those who refuse to die but to ensure, through the use of force, that they will be exposed to death and compelled to accept the rationing of life by the market."
Montag, Warren "Necro–economics: Adam Smith and death in the life of the universal" Radical Philosophy 134 November–December 2005 pp 7–17
...
If the drug trade is so significant economically, then the right to kill exercised by the Narcos, is ultimately accepted as part of that set of relations. As the recent Reyes–Salazar and Escobedo cases illustrate, the conditions by which this ‘rationing of life’ occurs is beyond the control of much of the body politic. Also, in this situation it we can’t always distinguish between state powers and organized crime, as it is well known that these organizations sponsor politicians and have law enforcers on their payroll, often also by force. Perhaps, to follow Margolles analogy, the situation is like an ‘infection’ of civic life. A economy infected by death – where death proscribes the rituals and processes of daily life.
...
Huitzilopochtli the sun god and source of all life commanded terrible fear that had to be assuaged by human sacrifice.
No comments:
Post a Comment